Please see this PDF for the latest update on UK aerodromes under threat.
Please see this PDF for the latest update on UK aerodromes under threat.
Chairman’s Report to the 22nd Annual General Meeting
15th June 2018, Wycombe Air Park
Welcome to our 22nd AGM and my thanks to all who have enabled the GAAC to continue its work as the recognised single voice for the GA Community on all matters related to airfields.
DfT response to the GAAC Ministerial Briefing Paper
Last year the GAAC prepared a paper for the then Minister for Aviation, Lord Ahmad, setting out the need to identify a Network of Airfields of strategic importance to the UK Economy, which recognised the different needs of the many sectors of GA.
The DfT responded to this paper by appointing York Aviation in January 2018 ‘… to undertake a study concerning the identification of a strategic network of general aviation aerodromes.’
The initial findings by York Aviation confirm:
1. 1. That there is no single network – GA is too disparate.
2. 2. There is segmentation between user groups.
3. 3. The functioning of the network is about ‘capability’ and ‘access’.
4. 4. The network is not static and must accommodate future needs.
5. 5. Future needs will recognise the use of autonomous aerial systems providing both freight and personal transport.
The GAAC has met with York Aviation both jointly with others and to provide guidance and we look forward to the outcome of their deliberations.
The All-Party Parliamentary Group on General Aviation (APPG)
During the past year the APPG for GA was set up to become the voice of General Aviation in Parliament. This is supported by 150 Parliamentary members from across all parties and both Houses of Parliament. It is an influential Group and I am glad to report that the GAAC is a primary participant in the Working Groups. Indeed, John Gilder, your vice-chairman, chairs the APPG Working Group on Airfields and I chair the APPG Working Group on Tax and Regulation. Meanwhile The Airspace Working Group is chaired by Pete Stratten of the BGA.
We are also pleased to say that many members of our Board also serve on these working groups and represent your diverse aviation interests. Notable achievements so far have enabled Government to recognise that the wider aviation sector supported by GA contributes some £60 Billion to the UK economy and that Government’s objective is to make the UK the best country in the world for General Aviation.
Changes to the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) have already confirmed that ‘Planning Policies should….recognise the importance of maintaining a national network of general aviation facilities – taking into account their economic value in serving business, leisure, training and emergency service needs…and the Government’s General Aviation Strategy.’
All supporters of GA are invited to raise valid questions on GA concerns which the GAAC will put forward to be raised in Parliament. Baroness Sugg is the current Minister for Aviation.
Closely aligned with the new Government recognition of GA was the appointment of Byron Davies as the GA Champion at the DfT. We are in very regular contact with Byron and glad for the high level contact he provides. Indeed, Chris Grayling the Secretary of State at the DfT is also being most helpful.
Briefly, as nothing is yet decided, it is my view that it should be perfectly possible for the UK to participate as an ‘Associated Country’ in the same way as Iceland; Liechtenstein, Norway and Switzerland and continue under EASA’s safety legislation. Hopefully, reason will prevail and a smooth transition be endorsed in the interests of all ‘Member States’ as EASA (for simplicity) currently refers to the 28 EU Members and the four Associated Countries.
Our liaison with the CAA continues to be excellent and this year we would thank Andrew Haines, who retires this year, for his help as well as welcome Richard Moriarty as his successor. We must also acknowledge continued support for GA from Tony Rapson.
The GAAC has advanced its real influence on achieving change for the benefit of GA at minimal costs thanks to the support of our major donors. But we are still slowly eroding our reserves as we make a small loss each year despite all the voluntary unpaid work of our Board and Working Group Members.
We have to address this issue and would ask all to consider whether they receive value for their support….and, if possible, consider contributing a little more. It will be money well spent. We shall also work to spread our net more widely to the flying community and have plans which we hope will come to fruition in the year ahead. Likewise we need to improve our communications and this, too, is in hand.
It remains only for me to thank my fellow officers: John Gilder whose work on the APPG alone would more than keep him busy; Roger Wilson who keeps our Accounts under control and Jonathan Morton for his guidance to me and arrangements for our Meetings in which connection I must also thank Mandy Sarney for providing us with our room today.
I would also thank all the members of our Board and Working Group for their input throughout the year…without which we could not have provided the necessary information to Government, Regulators and others which keeps GA meeting the challenges it faces.
Charles Henry FRAeS
Please Click HERE for PDF of AERODROMES UPDATE, issued JUNE 2018.
You will be aware that we have been successful in getting a General Aviation paragraph in the all-important draft National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF). The consultation closes on 10th May, and we want to ensure that the entire GA sector is backing our call to strengthen planning guidance for airfields in this country. Therefore please could I encourage you to ask as many people as possible to go to our website www.generalaviationappg.uk/nppf and add their name to the campaign!
At the time of writing over 2,800 people have responded via our website form, meaning that the Minister of Housing, Communities & Local Government will be receiving an unprecedented General Aviation response. However, there is more you can do. Since all your Working Group members represent different aviation organisations, please could you ask them to write from their respective organisations (i.e. not just via our website form), backing the amendments the APPG has proposed. As a former Planning Minister, I absolutely know that these responses will be seen with the additional weight of coming from individual GA organisations and not being part of a form driven response. This is therefore extremely important.
AERODROMES UPDATE (Updated 5 March 2018)
|Andrewsfield||Braintree, Colchester and Tendring Councils are co-operating in developing a Local Plan for North-East Essex with an area including Andrewsfield airfield, earmarked for a garden community with ultimately 10,000 homes. The definitive Local Plan is the subject of Public Examination with the hearings on garden communities held in January 2018.|
|Resident Upward Bound Trust Gliding Club given notice to quit – site earmarked in Aylesbury Vale District Council emerging Local Plan for housing / economic development.|
|Blackpool||Balfour-Beatty sold their 95% interest in the airport and associated land to Blackpool Council (who held the remaining 5% interest) for £4.25 million with funds for the purchase coming from the sale of airport land for industrial purposes. A masterplan for both the adjoining Enterprise Zone and airport has been adopted ensuring continued airport operations until at least 2040.|
|Bourn||Site earmarked for 3,200 homes in current draft Local Plan by South Cambridgeshire District Council. The draft Plan was the subject of Public Examination by a Planning Inspector with specific hearings on the proposals for Bourn airfield held on 4 April 2017.|
|Chalgrove||Airfield occupied and operated by Martin-Baker Aircraft (MBA) has been transferred from the MoD to Homes England (previously the Homes and Communities Agency). Site included in South Oxfordshire District definitive Local Plan public consultation document for a 3,000 home development with a new runway for MBA operations. Consultation ended on 30 November 2017. Media reports that Homes England will use their CPO powers if current negotiations with MBA, who wish to expand their on-site operations, about the development are unsuccessful.|
|Deenethorpe||Site accepted under the Government’s Garden Village scheme for development with up to 1,500 homes which development is supported by the Brudenell Estate, the site owner. Public consultations on a proposed site masterplan commenced in March 2018 prior to a planning application being made in Autumn 2018.|
|Dunsfold||Planning application for mixed use development with 1,800 homes on site approved by Waverley Borough Council on 14 December 2016. Local Parish Council representations caused the application to be called in for a Public Inquiry and the Planning Inspector’s report was submitted to Central Government on 12 October 2017 with a decision now expected on or before 15 March 2018.|
|Elvington||York City Council Local Plan public consultation document issued on 18 September 2017 included a development of up to 3,330 dwellings partly occupying the middle section of the Elvington airfield runway. The consultation ended on 30 October 2017 with final Local Plan consultation now on-going between February and April 2018.|
|Fairoaks||Surrey Heath Council made a confidential, unsuccessful bid to establish a Garden Village with 1,500 homes on site under Government scheme. Tenants advised later of proposal and public consultations started in February 2017 with planning application originally planned for submission late in 2017. A local group opposing the Garden Village proposal presented an alternative scheme (“Fairoaks 2020”) that retains the airfield at public meetings held in January 2018|
|Halfpenny Green (Wolverhampton Business Airport)||Aerodrome sold to MCR Property Group an investment and development company focused on commercial and residential real estate. The Group expected to complete an initial study by Autumn 2017 of future airport income and investment that reportedly excludes housing on the site. A tenant has written to MCR inviting them to consider a consortium to run the aerodrome.|
|Hullavington||The former RAF Hullavington airfield site has been sold to Dyson Ltd who has planning permission to renovate two existing Type D hangars as research centres. An outline planning application for a site masterplan is expected later in 2018.|
|Kemble||Commercial Estates Group (CEG) proposal to build a 2,000 home sustainable village on this ‘brownfield’ site as an alternative to the draft Cotswold District Local Plan proposal for a greenfield site near Cirencester. Definitive Local Plan was submitted for Public Examination in June 2017 and public hearings started on 10 October 2017.|
|Long Marston||Airfield is designated in Stratford-on-Avon emerging Local Plan for housing and has Garden Village approval. Public consultation on a Supplementary Planning Document for the site ended on 1 December 2017. Developer is Cala Homes in conjunction with site owner. Refer to entry for Wellesbourne Mountford on page 3.|
|River Oak Strategic Partners will apply in Spring 2018 for a Development Consent Order for the aerodrome as a Nationally Significant Infrastructure Project. Site owners are consulting on a revised masterplan for mixed use which retains 1,199 metres of the existing runway; relocates the existing aviation museums and provides homes with runway access. A planning application for the revised scheme is expected to be made early in 2018. Thanet District Council has rejected the definitive Local Plan submission for mixed use development of the site.|
|MoD Sites The following MoD aerodrome sites are planned for disposal in the years indicated:|
|Abingdon 2029||Site earmarked for Garden Village style development with ultimately 4,000 homes in Vale of White Horse District Council document for which consultation ended on 22 November 2017.|
|Alconbury 2023||Major part of site already being developed with 5,000 homes.|
|Arbroath 2020||RMB Condor airfield – Press report that Angus Council will be given the site for a 2,500 home development.|
|Brawdy 2024||Cawdor barracks|
|Chivenor 2027||Local Government agencies have been lobbying to keep a military presence at this RM barracks.|
|Colerne 2018||Airfield sale being delayed to coincide with sale of adjoining Azimghur Barracks in 2031. Local business interest in maintaining the airfield for aviation purposes.|
|Dishforth 2031||Airfield site being disposed of but not included for any development in any emerging Local Plan but expected to be considered during first 5 year review of the definitive plan.|
|Halton 2022||Aylesbury Vale District Council’s definitive Local Plan issued for public consultation does not include the airfield for any development.|
|Henlow 2020||Site earmarked for mixed use development in Central Bedfordshire Council draft Local Plan out for consultation ending on 22 February 2018.|
|Mildenhall 2024||Forest Heath District Council Vision & Prospectus document for the site retains the aviation facilities including the runway.|
|Molesworth 2024||When vacated by the USAF, site due to be transferred to Homes England and currently earmarked to be cleared for housing. Site has been included in a recent Housing and Economic Land Availability Assessment conducted by Huntingdonshire District Council.|
|North Luffenham 2021||Defence Infrastructure Organisation (DIO) and Rutland County Council discussing Garden Village proposal for this site.|
|Wethersfield 2020||Airfield site being transferred to Homes England in 2020. The resident 614 Volunteer Gliding Squadron is moving to the former RAF Swanton Morley (now Robertson Barracks) which is also due for closure in 2031.|
|Woodbridge 2027||Rock barracks|
|Wyton 2018||Airfield is being sold off – DIO and local property developer Crest Nicholson proposal for up to 4,500 homes on site. Due to road infrastructure issues, site deleted from Huntingdonshire District Council definitive 2036 Local Plan for mixed use development including housing|
|North Denes||The airfield (also known as Yarmouth Heliport) with two grass runways has been put up for sale having been disused since 2015 on the cessation of North Sea helicopter operations.|
|With the support of the land owner, site earmarked for up to 4,000 homes in Local Plan Core Strategy adopted by Rushcliffe Borough Council after approval from Planning Inspector. Public consultation completed into Local Plan preferred sites (other than Core Strategy sites) options.|
|Old Sarum||Site owner’s proposal for housing development and 10 additional hangars amongst other work, objected to by various parties as detrimental to the site’s heritage and potentially limiting use of the airfield. After prolonged discussion with Wiltshire Council with no decision forthcoming, an appeal has been made to the Planning Inspectorate for non-determination of the application.|
|Panshanger||Welwyn Hatfield Borough Council definitive Local Plan allows the opportunity for a realigned grass runway on land to north of previous runway 11/29. Definitive Local Plan subject to on-going Public Examination with specific hearings concerning the aerodrome site taking place on 20 February 2018. Two separate parties seeking to re-open the aerodrome and one of these parties have submitted an outline planning application to reinstate the aerodrome.|
|Peterborough / Sibson||Huntingdonshire District Council submitted an unsuccessful bid for a 2,500 home Garden Village on site. The Council subsequently withdrew their support for the proposal. However, the site is listed in the Council’s recent Housing and Economic Land Availability Assessment.|
|Plymouth||FlyPlymouth, a local social enterprise aerodrome support group, plans to reopen the aerodrome and start regional airline services. Sutton Harbour Holdings, the site lease holder, have proposed a mixed use development although the definitive Plymouth City / South-West Devon Joint Local Plan retains the site for aviation. The definitive Local Plan was submitted on 31 July 2017 for Public Examination with specific hearings on the Airport held in February 2018.|
|Redhill||Land owner and Thakeham Homes, a local housing developer, have proposed a 6,000 to 8,000 home garden village on the site and adjacent land. Tandridge District Council public consultation on four potential garden village sites including Redhill ended on 9 October 2017. A further Local Plan consultation is expected later in 2018. The current draft Local Plan currently earmarks Redhill for employment purposes and notes that it is in the Green Belt with a high risk of surface water flooding.|
|Wellesbourne Mountford||Gladman Developments in conjunction with the owner have proposed a housing development with 1,600 homes on the site although the Stratford-on-Avon Local Plan Core Strategy has earmarked Long Marston airfield as a preferred housing development site. The Core Strategy after approval by a Planning Inspector has been adopted by the Council and states that “The aviation related functions at Wellesbourne Airﬁeld will have been retained and enhanced”. Tenants previously notified by owner that flying activities would cease in December 2016 but the airfield remains open pending the result of court action by the tenants to obtain new leases. The District Council has formally rescinded the owner’s permitted development rights for the airfield and is seeking to negotiate a possible purchase of the site.|
|Wycombe Air Park||Site lease holder (Helicopter Aircraft Holdings Ltd) has agreed new leases with the land owner, Wycombe District Council (WDC). Draft Local Plan provides for an industrial / warehousing complex on south-eastern part of the site resulting in loss of a runway and relocation of gliding activities. The draft plan has been issued for public consultation which ended on 27 November 2017 and the Council expect to submit the definitive plan for public examination in March 2018.|
For those who have not yet seen the change to our Government’s National Planning Policy Framework, the new paragraph added to this Policy is:
105. Planning policies should:
f) recognise the importance of maintaining a national network of general aviation facilities – taking into account their economic value in serving business, leisure, training and emergency service needs, and the Government’s General Aviation Strategy.
Hopefully, the GAAC representation on the APPG which, in no small part was responsible for the above change, will also be recognised by your own member and justify continued support by your Association.
Our next target is to clarify the ‘Brownfield’ issue and have specific Government Policies in place to exclude Airfields from being developed as such.
Kind regards and thanks to those whose efforts have been rewarded.
The Aviation Club of the UK was founded in February 1990 to create a networking forum for members and a vehicle for promoting and developing all aspects of civil aviation. The Club has more than 500 professional members from a broad cross-section of the civil aviation community, such as airlines, airports, finance houses, manufacturers, regulators, and the media.
The Aviation Club UK are keen to understand the current awareness and interest in the Club, particularly from those in the industry aged 20 – 35. They would be very grateful if you could take a few minutes to complete the attached brief survey. Please feel free to pass on to colleagues as they would like as many opinions as possible.
Please find attached the link to the survey that is aimed at young people aged between 19 and 35. https://www.surveymonkey.co.uk/r/AviationClubUK
Unlicensed Sites listed in the UK AIP
The Civil Aviation Authority and NATS are conducting a survey to validate the list of various unlicensed airfields and aerial sporting activity locations published in the Aeronautical Information Publication (AIP) and depicted on CAA VFR charts. The reason for this survey is to establish whether existing published sites in the AIP are still current, operating, accurately reflected in AIS products, and to identify a principal point of contact for each site.
Upon closure of this survey on 28/02/2018, the CAA will establish definitive criteria for what constitutes a ‘significant’ activity at unlicensed sites, and subsequently arrange for the revision of all future AIS products based on that criteria from March 2018 onwards.
All site owners or landowners where established aircraft and/or aerial sporting activities at unlicensed sites are requested to take part in this survey by completing the Unlicensed & Uncertificated Sites Form
Unlicensed sites which fail to complete this survey by 28/02/2018 may result in a location that is currently published in the AIP, and depicted on CAA VFR charts, being removed from the NATS AIS database and all future AIS products, including CAA VFR charts. The CAA therefore requests that all users of unlicensed sites ensure that the site owner or land owner is aware of this survey.
Panshanger Aerodrome on the outskirts of Welwyn Garden City was one of the most successful GA airfields in the UK and has been closed for three years. In October 2016, Welwyn Hatfield Council made a historic u-turn decision to amend their Draft Local Plan to include provision of an airfield at Panshanger with the following commitments:
“In addition, the Masterplan will allow the opportunity for a realigned grass runway on land to the north of the Green Belt boundary.”
“…, development at the site will be configured in such a way that the opportunity remains for the relocation of the grass runway to be provided on Green Belt land to the north of SDS1 [Panshanger development site]”
This pledge is under serious threat of being swept under the carpet in the interest of planners’ convenience.
The Green Belt area as it stands is of insufficient width at the centre of the site to support a runway compliant with CAA regulations.
We are a team of local experts with a vision to recreate Panshanger Aerodrome as a source of delight and pleasure for both local residents and the aviation community. Our mission is to ensure that the council fulfil their promise not only to the people of Welwyn & Hatfield but the general aviation community nationally.
Working closely with the University of Hertfordshire, we plan to support education, training and employment locally. Please sign our petition to ensure that the council keep their promise in providing the people with what they want – Panshanger Aerodrome back operational as a real community asset that everyone can be proud of.
Project Phoenix is an awareness campaign launched to demonstrate the support for the airfield both in the local community and elsewhere, to prevent the council from reneging on their commitment to providing for the continuation of an airfield by council inaction and inertia!
With broad public support, we will prevent this from becoming an opportunity lost to council inertia!
Panshanger will rise from the ashes, but in order to make this happen, we need YOUR support!